Tuesday, November 1, 2022

4.3 The Social Class Ladder

As students enter, please try to create a model of the median American based on what we have been learning:


1. What does the median American look like in terms of:
A) Income
B) Wealth
C) Location
D) Education

2.  Can you explain how a few of these components connect to one another?  In other words, for example, how does ones income lead to education to prestige to wealth?  


Putting the Dimensions of Class Together

All of the elements that we have been exploring combine to form a rough picture of social class.  There is not a universally accepted model for social class but income, wealth, education, location, prestige/power all can arguably play a part in determining class.

Using your knowledge of what the median American looks like, let's evaluate social class in America.  Think about these guiding questions as we go along today:

  • What are the different classes in the US?
  • Is there a middle class, and if so, what is it?


Gilbert's Model
Sociologists have used different models of social class to explain how social class disaggregates in the United States.  The table below is based on Hamilton College professor Dennis Gilbert's 1992 model of social class.



Which class do you think your family is, based on Gilbert's model?  
Extra: If you want to explore more about where someone fits on the class ladder, you can explore an interactive graphic that shows where a person places on various aspects of class.  This interactive graphic is based on a series that the  NY Times did about social class called Class Matters. 

What do you think about Gilbert's model?  Any questions?




Williams' Model

Another model for the class structure is from Dr. Joan Williams who wrote the book White Working Class; Overcoming Class Cluelessness in America.


Dr. Williams' book came out of an article she wrote about the 2016 election posted here in Harvard Business Review.


(Extra) For more about her work, see these:
Powerpoint slides here.





Watch the following TED Talk by Dr. Williams.  It is about 15min long, but it is insightful. 
Here is her Ted Talk.

 
 If you want to watch additional videos or a shorter one:

Here is a 2 minute explanation by the author on Youtube.

Here is a 4 minute interview with the author on Fox News.

And Williams started a project to address the education divide called Diploma Divide.


6.  How does Williams' model differ from Gilberts'?
 

7.  What do you think of Dr. Williams's model of social class?  Do you think she does a good job of explaining why enough of middle American voters went from supporting Obama to supporting Trump? 

Her article and her model of social class focus on these groups:

The "poor" class
  • the bottom 30% 
  • making less than 40K
  • median income of $22K
The "working" class
  • the middle 55%   
  • approx. $41K - $131K
  • median of $75K
  • jobs may involve physical work, taking orders or implementing the work from managers
  • thrives on morals and telling the truth even if the truth is offensive
  • sees role as parent as a provider of essentials like safety, morals and wellness
  • work as a means to an identity; I work so that I can...watch baseball, go fishing, etc...
  • values self-employment/owning own business
  • See college as expensive and risky
  • See professional/managerial jobs as distant and leaving family behind
The "professional-managerial elite" or "PME"
  • the top 14% on earners and at least one college degree in household
  • earns more than $131K per year 
  • median of $173,000
  • jobs involve advanced degrees such as MBA, JD, MD, and other doctorates
  • work is making decisions and overseeing them for the company or business, but less about implementing the decisions 
  • values outward appearance and fitting their role
  • sees role as parent to provide opportunity to their kids
  • identity is often based on work or title


Princeton University sociologist, Robert Wuthnow explains the dynamic that Joan Williams describes in his book 
The Left Behind; Decline and Rage in Rural America that location has strongly affected how rural Americans feel and how they vote.  

Here is a 2018 interview with Professor Wuthnow from Vox.

What is fueling rural America’s outrage toward the federal government? Why did rural Americans vote overwhelmingly for Donald Trump? And, beyond economic and demographic decline, is there a more nuanced explanation for the growing rural-urban divide? Drawing on more than a decade of research and hundreds of interviews, Robert Wuthnow brings us into America’s small towns, farms, and rural communities to paint a rich portrait of the moral order — the interactions, loyalties, obligations, and identities—underpinning this critical segment of the nation. Wuthnow demonstrates that to truly understand rural Americans’ anger, their culture must be explored more fully. Wuthnow argues that rural America’s fury stems less from specific economic concerns than from the perception that Washington is distant from and yet threatening to the social fabric of small towns. Rural dwellers are especially troubled by Washington’s seeming lack of empathy for such small-town norms as personal responsibility, frugality, cooperation, and common sense. Wuthnow also shows that while these communities may not be as discriminatory as critics claim, racism and misogyny remain embedded in rural patterns of life.


In our last lesson, we examined the difficulty with defining "middle class" in the United States.  Today we will examine the bottom of the social class ladder, the Americans with the lowest incomes.  Remember that this unit is focused on the inequalities (both obstacles and opportunities) that come from different social class positions.  As the lesson goes on, please keep in mind these guiding questions:
  • What are the difficulties in defining "poverty"?
  • What are the obstacles associated with the lowest social classes?

Here is the link to the Google Form for this lesson.  

Defining Poverty

Obviously, we saw that the U.S. has a wide range of income and a substantial number of citizens who are low income.  But how many of these low-income earners should be considered "poor"?  Experts talk about poverty in various ways.  This 2019 analysis from the Annie E. Casey Foundation explains some of the most common terms used to describe poverty in the United States today: official poverty measure and the supplemental poverty measure, extreme poverty, low income, concentrated poverty.

The simplest way to define poverty is a threshold of income based on family size and the cost of food.  Most experts believe that this number is too low and the actual number of Americans living in poverty should be much higher.  In any case, the official poverty measure threshold for a family of 4 in 2018 was $25,465.  About 12% of Americans fall into this threshold!  That's 39 million Americans!  Thirty. Nine. Million.

Besides the official number, there are other ways of calculating the actual number of people in poverty and these measure report higher numbers of poverty.  And then there is a substantial number of Americans who do not qualify as impoverished but they are so low income that they are considered at-risk.  They are working and getting by, but barely.  One accident or unfortunate event can thrust them into poverty.

1.  After clicking on the link above, what are the differences between the official poverty measure and the supplemental poverty measure?


Online Simulation

Living in poverty means many Americans have to make hard choices about their lives.  Try the playspent website which guides readers through the difficult choices that those in poverty must make.  When finished, please reflect on the simulation.

2.  What happened in the simulation that made it difficult for you to be economically stable?  Was there something that came up during the simulation that you had not thought about before?   



Poverty and location

Poverty, like the other social classes, is segregated within the U.S. so we do not always notice it.  Click on the map here. 

3.  What is the poverty rate in Lake County?  


Now on the poverty map, click on the US as a whole.

4.  How high is poverty in Lake County compared to the U.S. ?    What areas of the U.S. have the largest numbers of poverty?



Effects of Poverty

Hypothesize  about the ways that poverty might affect people in terms of:
  • Health
  • Location/environment
  • Criminal Justice System

Health
Americans with low income have a higher chance of dying at any age than a wealthy person!  

Some of the evidence that supports and explains this claim:


Unnatural causes is a website and documentary about the connection between social class and health;
UNNATURAL CAUSES is the acclaimed documentary series broadcast by PBS and now used by thousands of organizations around the country to tackle the root causes of our alarming socio-economic and racial inequities in health.
The four-hour series crisscrosses the nation uncovering startling new findings that suggest there is much more to our health than bad habits, health care, or unlucky genes. The social circumstances in which we are born, live, and work can actually get under our skin and disrupt our physiology as much as germs and viruses.
Among the clues:
• It's not CEOs dropping dead from heart attacks, but their subordinates.
• Poor smokers are at higher risk of disease than rich smokers.
• Recent Latino immigrants, though typically poorer, enjoy better health than the average American. But the longer they're here, the worse their health becomes.
Furthermore, research has revealed a gradient to health. At each step down the class pyramid, people tend to be sicker and die sooner. Poor Americans die on average almost six years sooner than the rich. No surprise. But even middle class Americans die two years sooner than the rich. And at each step on that pyramid, African Americans, on average, fare worse than their white counterparts. In many cases, so do other peoples of color.
But why? How can class and racism disrupt our physiology? Through what channels might inequities in housing, wealthy, jobs, and education, along with a lack of power and control over one's life, translate into bad health? What is it about our poor neighborhoods, especially neglected neighborhoods of color, that is so deadly? How are the behavioral choices we make (such as diet and exercise) constrained by the choices we have?

From Voices For Illinois Children, we see that the number of children in poverty has been increasing and the effects can be very damaging; 
Growing up in poverty can have serious and long-lasting effects on children’s health, development, and overall well-being. The effects of poverty have a well-documented impact on young children’s developing brains. And children who grow up in poverty are more likely to experience harmful levels of stress, more likely to struggle in school, and more likely to have behavioral, social, and emotional problems than their peers.

Lead poisoning from the American Journal of Pediatrics;
Impoverished black children, for example, are twice as likely as poor Hispanic or white children to have levels of lead in their blood that is at least 2.5 micrograms per deciliter. Some researchers have found that even that small amount of lead is enough to cause cognitive impairment in children — especially the kind that impacts their reading ability.


Cardiovascular disease 
from the National Institute of Health (NIH), Journal of Nutrition (2010); 
Food insecurity was associated with self-reported hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Food insecurity was associated with laboratory or examination evidence of hypertension and diabetes. The association with laboratory evidence of diabetes did not reach significance in the fully adjusted model unless we used a stricter definition of food insecurity. These data show that food insecurity is associated with cardiovascular risk factors. Health policy discussions should focus increased attention on ability to afford high-quality foods for adults with or at risk for chronic disease.

 from the NIH, journal of Current Cardiology Reviews (2009); 

Once homeless, equitable access to both preventative and remedial health care is lacking and is associated with a higher than average burden of cardiovascular disease [CVD] risk factors, morbidity and mortality and is accompanied by disproportionately high health care costs.

Less access to healthcare, from the NIH, Journal of Community Health (2018);
Having a low-income presents a variety of problems for families and children, with access to health care being the most complex and prevalent. Although there are many challenges for low-income families to access adequate health care in the United States, the key barriers identified in this review of literature are a lack of education, complications with health insurance, and a distrust of health care providers. Each obstacle is influenced by a myriad of factors that affect vulnerable sub-groups of low-income families. Acknowledging the barriers that prevent access to health care for low-income families is the first step towards determining future sustainable solutions.

Affects brain development
 from the UW Madison, Institute for Research on Poverty (2019);
Ongoing research, however, is moving beyond correlation to test a causal relationship between growing up in poverty and development in key parts of the brain that govern learning and behavior. Findings suggest that aspects of poverty that affect brain development go beyond limited financial resources to include neighborhood violence, low-quality schools, environmental toxins, and unstable family life. 


Increased levels of stress, mental illness, suicide, and substance abuse from the Journal of the American Medical Association (2011);
Low levels of household income are associated with several lifetime mental disorders and suicide attempts, and a decrease in income is associated with a higher risk for anxiety, substance use, and mood disorders, according to a new study.

The connection between poverty and diabetes including obesity and poor diet and sedentary lifestyle from the American Diabetes Association;
One reason may be that violence tracks with poverty, thereby preventing people from being active out-of-doors. Similarly, parks and sports facilities are less available to people living in poor counties (5), and people who live in poverty-dense regions may be less able to afford gym membership, sports clothing, and/or exercise equipment. There are multiple individual and environmental reasons to explain why poverty-dense counties may be more sedentary and bear greater obesity burdens.

Environment 

From the CDC, here is an explanation of the social determinants of health;
Conditions in the places where people live, learn, work, and play affect a wide range of health risks and outcomes.1 These conditions are known as social determinants of health (SDOH).We know that poverty limits access to healthy foods and safe neighborhoods and that more education is a predictor of better health.2,3,4 We also know that differences in health are striking in communities with poor SDOH such as unstable housing, low income, unsafe neighborhoods, or substandard education.

...early-life exposures to nitrogen dioxide (NO2), a marker of traffic-related pollution, and fine particulate matter (PM2.5), a mixture of industrial and other pollutants, are positively associated with subsequent childhood asthma diagnosis...

From Yale’s School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Scientific American documents numerous particulates of air pollution containing more hazardous ingredients in non-white and low-income communities than in affluent white ones, a new study shows.


From the Huffington Post, the poor are more likely to experience asthma and other health issues.  


From the Florida Times Union;
...poor black children are more likely than poor white or Hispanic children to be diagnosed with asthma — another ailment that plagues poor children in Jacksonville and one that is linked to living in older, more industrialized areas. Poor white children, though, are more likely to be exposed to secondhand smoke, or to be born to mothers who smoked during pregnancy than poor black or Hispanic children. And poor Hispanic children, it found, are twice as likely to have no place to go for health care, as compared to poor white or black children.



Ron Finley, guerrilla gardener, TED talk about being arrested for planting a vegetable garden in a poor neighborhood.

 

 


And Clint Smith, a Washington DC teacher explains in his slam poem the ways that location affects his students.  As you watch, make a list of the ways that location affects them:


Criminal Justice
Poor people are more likely to enter the criminal justice system and remain there.



Loyola's 2022 New Student Convocation featured keynote speaker Reuben Jonathon Miller, Loyola alum, and professor at University of Chicago.  Miller highlighted the many ways that the criminal justice system creates obstacles for those who enter it.  You can read more about Miller's work from NPR here.















This has been published about since 1979's The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison

This is one revelation in William Chambliss's study called "The Saints and the Roughnecks" Chambliss argues that money was a key factor in preventing kids from getting into trouble. If you have enough money it helps you cover up the deviance. Do you think this applies to kids at our school (no names please). Who is deviant? How do they hide it? Does money play a role? Is everyone at school a "saint"? Another important revelation in Chambliss's research is that the kids who accept the label of "deviant" then act upon that label. In other words, if I think that everyone expects me to be deviant, I may accept that as the truth and then I act deviant. Once you are labeled as "deviant", that becomes a stigma or a badge of disgrace that you carry with you. Sociologists who study this perspective call it the labeling theory.




From Spotlight on Poverty and Georgetown University Law Professor, Peter Edelmen's book, Not A Crime To Be Poor;
In one of the richest countries on Earth it has effectively become a crime to be poor. For example, in Ferguson, Missouri, the U.S. Department of Justice didn’t just expose racially biased policing; it also exposed exorbitant fines and fees for minor crimes that mainly hit the city’s poor, African American population, resulting in jail by the thousands. As Peter Edelman explains in Not a Crime to Be Poor, in fact Ferguson is everywhere: the debtors’ prisons of the twenty-first century. The anti-tax revolution that began with the Reagan era led state and local governments, starved for revenues, to squeeze ordinary people, collect fines and fees to the tune of 10 million people who now owe $50 billion.

Nor is the criminalization of poverty confined to money. Schoolchildren are sent to court for playground skirmishes that previously sent them to the principal’s office. Women are evicted from their homes for calling the police too often to ask for protection from domestic violence. The homeless are arrested for sleeping in the park or urinating in public.

The chart below from the Bureau of Justice Statistics shows the different stages of the criminal justice system. In each stage, a person of lower social class is more likely to progress through the system than a person of upper social class.

From the Prison Policy Initiative: 

Far from offering people a "second chance," our criminal justice system frequently punishes those who never had a first chance: people in poverty. By focusing law enforcement on low-level offenses and subjecting criminal defendants to money bail and other fees, our country effectively punishes people for being poor.

Poverty is not only a predictor of involvement with the justice system: Too often, it is also the outcome. Criminal punishment subjects people to countless fines, fees, and other costs (often enriching private companies in the process). A criminal record, meanwhile, does lasting collateral damage.

POVERTY IN OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM IS TOO OFTEN TREATED AS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.  

Take driver’s licenses for instance: A driver with a busted tail light will be assessed a fine. For many living in poverty, they cannot afford to pay. If left unpaid, most states will eventually suspend the driver’s license.

Unless the person lives in a city with reliable public transportation, they will have to keep driving to stay employed – putting themselves at higher risk of punishment. Driving on a suspended license leads to additional suspension time and fines, a criminal record, and possible jail time. A simple lack of money can have devastating impacts on one’s livelihood.

The collateral consequences do not end there. Someone who can’t drive has a hard time staying employed or finding another job. A study in New Jersey showed that 42% of drivers who had suspended licenses lost their jobs and could not readily find another. Eligibility for public housing is restricted or denied if the applicant has a criminal record, including misdemeanors such as driving with a suspended license. Local public housing authorities can be even more restrictive and evict occupants if a member of their family or another person residing in commits a crime, such as a misdemeanor drug offense.

For someone with low income, having a busted tail light leads to criminal consequences, loss of employment, and even homelessness.
In the United States, wealth, not culpability, often shapes outcomes. From what is defined as criminal behavior to how penalties are decided, our legal system punishes people who are poor in America far more often and more harshly than the wealthy.

No person in America should be locked up because they are poor. Yet, every day we see homeless people arrested for sleeping outside; parents who can’t afford to purchase their release from jail; and people who cycle in and out of jail because they can’t afford to pay old fines as their debt grows from new ones. Meanwhile, cities and counties fill their coffers from the fines and fees that are imposed on people who are struggling just to survive. We need a criminal justice system that puts people over profit and helps to make vulnerable people more stable, not less stable.

Housing and Eviction

Housing and living expenses cost more if you are poor, from the ASA's Society Pages, 
Social science research demonstrates that the poor pay more for necessities like housing and food, and debt can have serious consequences beyond just financial. The poor pay significantly more for housing than others — sometimes 70% or 80% of their income. In 2018, low-income households paid over half their income for rent or lived in substandard housing. Further, landlords overcharge tenants in high poverty neighborhoods and those with higher concentrations of African Americans relative to the market value of the property. When families cannot afford basic needs they will make calculated tradeoffs to keep their housing, paying for rent instead of utilities to avoid eviction. Such tradeoffs often lead to compounded costs from late fees, and families living without water, electricity, or heat....Poor families tend to pay more for food, too....When poor people face fines and fees, their inability to pay or keep up with payments means they go further into debt. When these fees are part of the criminal justice system, failure to pay can also result in jail time.

Evicted by Matthew Desmond  

The award-winning book Evicted from Harvard sociologist Matthew Desmond shows how society profits off the poor and how lack of housing can lead families to spiral downward.

In this groundbreaking book, Harvard sociologist and 2015 MacArthur “Genius” Award winner Matthew Desmond takes readers into the poorest neighborhoods of Milwaukee, where families spend most of their income on housing and where eviction has become routine—a vicious cycle that deepens our country’s vast inequality. Based on years of embedded fieldwork and painstakingly gathered data, Evicted transforms our understanding of extreme poverty and economic exploitation while providing fresh ideas for solving a devastating, uniquely American problem.

Mercy Housing provides 6 ways that being poor costs more.

5.  What is one of the factors above (from either health, environment, criminal justice or housing) that you had not realized before?  Can you see how these factors make it difficult to rise out of poverty?


Poverty and Stigma

Morality and Health: News Media Constructions of Overweight and Eating Disorders (2010) by Abigail C. Saguy, Kjerstin Gruys Social Problems, Volume 57, Issue 2, 1 May 2010, Pages 231–250.
From the abstract:
In the contemporary United States, thinness is associated with high social status and taken as evidence of moral virtue. In contrast, fatness is linked to low status and seen as a sign of sloth and gluttony....news media in our sample typically discuss how a host of complex factors beyond individual control contribute to anorexia and bulimia. In that anorexics and bulimics are typically portrayed as young white women or girls, this reinforces cultural images of young white female victims. In contrast, the media predominantly attribute overweight to bad individual choices and tend to treat binge eating disorder as ordinary and blameworthy overeating. In that the poor and minorities are more likely to be heavy, such reporting reinforces social stereotypes of fat people, ethnic minorities, and the poor as out of control and lazy.



Other Resources:

Here is a link to the Stanford Center on Poverty where you can view slides about inequality in the USA.

Here is a link to 15 statistics about inequality in America.

Here is a an article from the Washington Post explaining the difficulty of defining the middle class.

After you have thought about your own personal example, classify the four people in this Esquire article and analyze what class they are and why?  Try to use components other than income.  How is each person shaped by their social class?



Thursday, October 13, 2022

Migration: Mexicans and Puerto Ricans in the Midwest

 Our next seminar, "The Making of a Migrant Public Sphere:  Mexicans and Puerto Ricans in the Midwest," will be by Dr. Juan Ignacio Mora (History, Indiana University – Bloomington). It is sponsored by the Latin American & Latinx Studies Program on Thursday, October 13th (4-5 PM, Sr. Jean Room North).  

Webinar about College Female's Friendships during Covid

 In "Undergraduate Women Forging Friendships during the Pre-Vaccine Pandemic," Wade will discuss her research on student social life in the 2020/21 academic year at Tulane. The talk will highlight a series of stories that illustrate how women made friends in the midst of COVID-19 and how the need for friendship influenced their pandemic-related decision-making.

If your students would like to attend live, please be sure they register using this link. The talk will take place on Thursday, October 13 at 12PM CST and we will leave time for questions at the end. If you cannot attend live, a recording will be made available. I look forward to seeing you there.

Loyola Sociology Alum Reuben Miller Keynote at 2022 New Student Convocation



Loyola's 2022 New Student Convocation featured keynote speaker Reuben Jonathon Miller, Loyola alum, and professor at University of Chicago.  Miller highlighted the many ways that the criminal justice system creates obstacles for those who enter it.  His work is published in his book,Halfway Home; Race, Punishment, and the Afterlife of Mass Incarceration.  You can read more about Miller's work from NPR here,

...those who leave incarceration are in many ways never truly free. They instead become members of the "supervised society" — and it is this uniquely disenfranchised population that is the focus of his book.
This indictment of the criminal justice system should trouble the soul of the nation. Miller writes in prose that is at once powerful and engaging — and combines an abundance of data with the lived experiences of the people the numbers represent. A sociologist, criminologist, social worker, and former chaplain at Chicago's Cook County Jail, his insights are partly drawn from having spent 15 years interviewing nearly 250 people caught up in the prison industrial complex. This work included a research project during which he spent three years engaging with 60 men and 30 women after their release from incarceration in Michigan. Miller can also claim far more experiential expertise, because he was "born black and poor in the age of mass incarceration" and, like every Black person he knows, "was stopped by the police a number of times." He is a scientist armed with statistical information, and he is the son and brother of incarcerated men.


In October of 2022, Dr. Miller was the recipient of a MacArthur Fellow Genius Award! Here is an article in the Chicago Sun Times profiling him.

Thursday, October 6, 2022

3.2 Family

 As students enter, please review this NY Magazine piece about Carolyn Dweck's book, Mindset.

Lesson Focus:

What are the ways that family influences individuals? 
What are the ways that family is changing in the U.S.?
How does this research compare to your family?


Family; The Most Influential Agent of Socialization

Family is the most important agent of socialization. Family shapes our self-concept first and before we are even conscious of it.  Human brain development happens most rapidly and greatly in the first few years after birth.  This UNICEF website (2016) explains what experts have concluded about brain development.  Dr. Suzana Herculano-Houzel explains the latest conclusions in this 5 min video.  The point is that much growth and development happens in the earliest years of human life so our first caregivers have an enormous impact on who we become.

Some of the influences from family are intentional.  Sociologists call direct lessons that are consciously taught manifest lessons.  Conversely, latent lessons are lessons that you learn unconsciously.  An anecdotal example from my own life is about my dad smoking.

Manifest - Don't smoke.

Latent - Stand this way.



And another example is when I was in college and considering what jobs to do afterwards.  Besides teaching, I considered both the Chicago Police and FBI - both jobs that my parents did.  But they never influenced me to do those jobs in a manifest lesson, instead it was more latent - I heard them talk about those jobs and it swayed me to consider them.


Answer individually:
What are some ways that you are similar to your family? Is this latent or manifest?  Why?


Evidence for Family Socialization 
There is much evidence for how individuals are socialized to think about their "self".  Examine the evidence below from sociologists.

Family Dinner - Latent Lessons from the Dinner Table


Family Integration and Self-Esteem







Family shapes your "self"


How is Dweck's research an example of family's influence on "self"?

Carol Dweck explains how parents and eventually schools both work to create a fixed mindset that actually prevents learning.

This Atlantic article the latest update to Dweck's research which shows that praise cannot be empty.  It must be directed in specific nuanced ways to promote growth.

This NPR review of the book includes an excerpt and an interview.

This NY Magazine article explains how to apply Dweck's research to parenting and talking to kids.

Brain Pickings review of Dweck's Research provides a thorough explanation and a few quotes from the book.

Dweck explains her work on this TED Talk

and she explains how we can teach a growth mindset in this talk from Stanford U.
 

Cross-Cultural Example of Family and Production of Culture and the Self
Life Lessons from Chinese Culture from NPR shows how families influence kids to accept aspects of their culture. What are the hidden messages in the storybooks we read to our kids? That's a question that may occur to parents as their children dive into the new books that arrived over the holidays.
And it's a question that inspired a team of researchers to set up a study. Specifically, they wondered how the lessons varied from storybooks of one country to another.

 

Explain how you have been shaped by parents to have either a "growth mindset" or a "fixed mindset"? 







A lesson for parents from Angel Harris

Have you ever been in trouble for poor grades? You may want to read this research by Keith Robinson and Angel Harris.  
A main finding from our analyses is that a non-punitive parenting philosophy enhances future academic performance. It may be that non-punitive strategies are particularly effective because they create an optimal setting under which children can devote more attention to schooling. This setting, void of punitive restrictions on activities, might foster the intrinsic motivation necessary for improved performance (). It might also be that parents are re-organizing the way children spend their time, for example, suggesting (rather than explicitly demanding) they exchange some time spent on extracurricular activities for time on activities more essential for academic success. An exchange of this sort may involve spending fewer hours watching television or time alone in recreation, to more time studying with friends or attending after-school classes over the same number of hours. In this way, parents are not using punitive measures to adjust the way their child spends time, which might be the most effective way to motivate children academically.



Angel Harris is a widely respected sociologist from Duke University who focuses on the effects of family, race and social class on student education.  Harris's book Kids Don't Want to Fail explains the influences that limit poor minority students.  From Harvard University Press,




 

"Despite achieving less in school, black students value schooling more than their white counterparts do. Black kids perform badly in high school not because they don’t want to succeed but because they enter without the necessary skills. Harris finds that the achievement gap starts to open up in preadolescence—when cumulating socioeconomic and health disadvantages inhibit skills development and when students start to feel the impact of lowered teacher expectations. Kids Don’t Want to Fail is must reading for teachers, academics, policy makers, and anyone interested in understanding the intersection of race and education."


The Changing Structure of Family

1. If I told you that I live with my family, who would you assume I mean?

2. What are some other ways to define family different than above?




My family and I dressed up as the family from Despicable Me one Halloween.  This was one of my favorite costumes but it also is an interesting example of the changing family in the U.S.  Most often, when Americans think of "family" they think of the nuclear family - two heterosexual partners, married and their children.  Although this is an ideal in many Americans' minds, sociologists question whether or not it was ever a reality.  Most family researchers will trace this back to the post-WWII era when these types of families seemed to peak.  However, the romanticized notion may be from media that created an ideal image of this family even if the reality was much different then and certainly is now.



One sociologist who researched the American family extensively using historical methods is Stephanie Coontz who writes,
Leave It to Beaver was not a documentary, a man’s home has never been his castle, the ‘male breadwinner marriage’ is the least traditional family in history, and rape and sexual assault were far higher in the 1970s than they are today. In The Way We Never Were, acclaimed historian Stephanie Coontz provides a myth-shattering examination of two centuries of the American family, sweeping away misconceptions about the past that cloud current debates about domestic life. The 1950s do not present a workable model of how to conduct our personal lives today, Coontz argues, and neither does any other era from our cultural past. This revised edition includes a new introduction and epilogue, looking at what has and has not changed since the original publication in 1992, and exploring how the clash between growing gender equality and rising economic inequality is reshaping family life, marriage, and male-female relationships in our modern era.

Here is a review of Coontz's book from the New Republic.

Here is a review of her work on Goodreads.


Family Structure in the U.S. is Changing

From the PEW Research Center, Trends Shaping the US (2017):

Americans’ lives at home are changing. Following a decades-long trend, just half of U.S. adults were married in 2015, down from 70% in 1950. As marriage has declined, the number in cohabiting relationships (living with an unmarried partner) rose 29% between 2007 and 2016, from 14 million to 18 million. The increase was especially large among those ages 50 and older: 75% in the same period. The “gray divorce” rate – divorces among those 50 and older – roughly doubled between 1990 and 2015.

Also, a record number of Americans (nearly 61 million in 2014) were living in multigenerational households, that is, households that include two or more adult generations or grandparents and grandchildren. Growing racial and ethnic diversity in the U.S. helps explain some of the rise in multigenerational living. The Asian and Hispanic populations overall are growing more rapidly than the white population, and those groups are more likely than whites to live in multigenerational family households.

Americans are more accepting of the changing structures than they have ever been. 

As family structures change in U.S., a growing share of Americans say it makes no difference
The American family is changing in many ways: Cohabitation is on the rise, more adults are delaying or forgoing marriage, a growing share of children are living with an unmarried parent, and same-sex marriage is legal in all 50 states.  Amid these changes, three-in-ten U.S. adults think it’s a good thing that there is growing variety in the types of family arrangements people live in, while about half as many (16%) say this is a bad thing. The largest share (45%) don’t think it makes a difference, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted in June 2019.

Here is a graph from Phil Cohen showing different types of households by decade 1900-2017:



3.  What conclusions can you make from the graph?


The share of adults who have lived with a romantic partner is now higher than the share who have ever been married; married adults are more satisfied with their relationships, more trusting of their partners 

Wendy Manning, Susan Brown and Krista Payne find that, among young adults, cohabitation no longer offsets the decline in marriage because cohabitation has plateaued. This cohabitation stall portends a shift to lower levels of overall union formation during young adulthood and may presage declining levels of marriage and cohabitation into middle age. Further, our findings call into question the widely accepted notion that the U.S. is on a path to reach the nearly universal levels of cohabitation observed in Western Europe. In the U.S., if current trends among young adults continue across age groups, cohabitation will no longer supplant marriage. Women will be less likely to form any union instead.

Size of Households
The number of people in the average U.S. household is going up for the first time in over 160 years.  This decade’s likely upturn in average household size reflects several demographic trends:
  • A growing share of the population resides in multigenerational family households.
  • More Americans in the wake of the Great Recession are “doubled up” in shared living quarters.
Related to the size of households,  this report from Pew explains that a majority of young adults in the U.S. live with their parents for the first time since the Great Depression  The coronavirus outbreak has pushed millions of Americans, especially young adults, to move in with family members. The share of 18- to 29-year-olds living with their parents has become a majority since U.S. coronavirus cases began spreading early this year, surpassing the previous peak during the Great Depression era.


Trends in Divorce




(Legal marriage age is determined by state laws see here for more and the graphic below)






4.  What demographic is most likely to divorce according to the graphs above?  What other conclusions can make from the graphs above?




Americans and Interracial Marriage









Other trends from the Pew Research Center on Family and Relationships and  Family Roles, Household/Family Structure and Intermarriage including these:

Sharing household chores is an important part of marriage for a majority of married adults. But among those who have children, there are notable differences in perceptions of who actually does more of the work around the house.

More than half of married couples in the United States say sharing household chores is “very important” to a successful marriage. But when it comes to grocery shopping and cooking, women tend to say they’re the ones usually doing the work, according to a time-use survey sponsored by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

C.  How American parents balance work and family life when both work
Today’s American families are more likely than those of past decades to feature two full-time working parents. A new Pew Research Center report looks at how working moms and dads in two-parent households are balancing their jobs with their family responsibilities and how they view the dynamics of sharing child care and household responsibilities.

D.  As Millennials Near 40, They’re Approaching Family Life Differently Than Previous Generations
A new analysis of government data by Pew Research Center shows that Millennials are taking a different path in forming – or not forming – families. Millennials trail previous generations at the same age across three typical measures of family life: living in a family unit, marriage rates and birth rates.

 E. School Outcomes of Children Raised by Same-Sex Parents: Evidence from Administrative Panel Data  These data include 2,971 children with same-sex parents (2,786 lesbian couples and 185 gay male couples) and over a million children with different-sex parents followed from birth. The results indicate that children raised by same-sex parents from birth perform better than children raised by different-sex parents in both primary and secondary education. Full article here.

  

Choose one of the above articles from the PEW that looks interesting.  Answer the questions below:  

6.  Which article did you choose?

7. After reading it, do you think the findings are interesting?

8.  What is either one finding you think is interesting or one criticism of the article?

9. Is this true for your family or families that you know?




Extra Resources about the changing family:

Cohabitation in Chicago Tribune
Seven percent of U.S. adults are currently cohabitating, and among that 7%, the fastest growing cohort consists of people 50 and older. Kevin McElmurry, Indiana University Northwest quoted in Chicago Tribune (2019)


Professor Medley-Rath from Sociology In Focus
In this post, Stephanie Medley-Rath discusses a few growing trends in family structure.
Medley-Rath covers data and changing families in these areas:
  • Cohabitation
  • Remaining Single Longer
  • Unmarried Parents
  • Living with Mom and Dad

Census Bureau and Changing Family

And from the Census Bureau, there is this data exercise which shows family changing.  The Census Bureau published this news release explaining the data.