The Origins of the Term "Racism"
In the New York Times’ archive there are, in fact, two pre-1936 references to “racism”, both from James G McDonald, League of Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (Jewish and other) coming from Germany.
The first is from a brief news report on 17 June 1935 quoting McDonald as using the term “racism” in relation to Adolf Hitler’s “contagious” anti-Jewish doctrines in a speech to the annual convention of Brith Sholom in Atlantic City, New Jersey, the day before.
The use of racism to describe the fascist anti-Jewish sentiment is also documented in the online dictionary of etymology.
However, by the end of his history of the term "racism," James Myburgh, a South African journalist and editor of Politicsweb, makes a compelling case that the reason why Jews were targeted in Germany and Italy was because they held enviable positions in banking, science and other areas of society.
I would counter that Myburgh has a point that Jews had achieved a level of success that raised the attention of fascists in Germany and Italy, but nonetheless, Jews did not have the political or social power to prevent the horrible violence that would be directed toward them. Myburgh is missing the forest for the trees. Race is a societal creation and should be viewed on a societal level. That means viewing Germany as a whole and Italy as a whole. This might be applied to the U.S. as many people with power have been minimized because of their race:
- As a State Senator, Barrack Obama once was mistaken for a waiter, and another time he was mistaken for a valet.
- Sterling Brown, a player for the Milwaukee Bucks, was tased and arrested for a parking violation.
- Henry Louis Gates, a prominent Harvard University professor, was arrested after police were called because he was trying to open his home's front door which was stuck.
- Serena Williams has endured multiple incidents of racism.
- Douglas Zeigler, a black NYC police chief who was off duty was harassed by another NYC police officer.
The Connection of Power to Racism
"A dynamic interrelationship exists between power andRacismThe dimensions of each concept cannot be appreciated without treating it in the context of the other."
The Problem with Language
Racism remains a force of enormous consequence in American life, yet no one can be accused of perpetrating it without a kicking up a grand fight. No one ever says, "Yeah, I was a little bit racist. I'm sorry." That's in part because racists, in our cultural conversations, have become inhuman. They're fairy-tale villains, and thus can't be real.
There's no nuance to these public fights, as a veteran crisis manager told my colleague, Hansi Lo Wang. Someone is either a racist and therefore an inhuman monster, or they're an actual, complex human being, and therefore, by definition, incapable of being a racist.
Ta-Nehisi Coates of The Atlantic, who often writes about race, is one of several writers and thinkers who has drawn attention to this paradox:
The idea that America has lots of racism but few actual racists is not a new one. Philip Dray titled his seminal history of lynching At the Hands of Persons Unknown because most "investigations" of lynchings in the South turned up no actual lynchers. Both David Duke and George Wallace insisted that they weren't racists. That's because in the popular vocabulary, the racist is not so much an actual person but a monster, an outcast thug who leads the lynch mob and keeps *Mein Kampf *in his back pocket.
Conclusion
- Many scholars/academics will connect racism to power.
- Race only exists because a power structure created it and by extension, racism can only exist because of that power structure.
- Whether you personally connect race to power in your everyday lexicon is less important than recognizing that racism does in fact exist and is very much connected to a legacy of policies that have unequally distributed power throughout U.S. history.
- That unequal distribution still has consequences and implications for today's reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment