Monday, January 31, 2022

2Soc Research Lesson 5: Doing Sociology; Methods

Today's lesson will focus on how sociologists actually do the work that they publish about.  Venkatesh highlights a number of different ways that sociologists examine society.  We will use his introduction to dive into how sociologists do research.

"He doesn't speak Spanish, but he probably speaks Mexican!"

Please look over the Gang Leader for a Day excerpt.


Read, comprehend and recall quiz

Please answer the questions here.
Thoughts on the reading? Questions? 

Click here to open the Google Form for this lesson.

1. What are the two broad ways sociologists gather data? (Venkatesh mentions these).  

2. Brainstorm:
What are the advantages and disadvantages of these 2 broad ways of researching?  





Quantitative                                    Qualitative
statistical analysis                             comparable descriptive analysis
value free                                          values are present and explicit
less context                                       contextual/nuanced
many cases/subjects                          fewer cases/subjects
researcher is detached                       researcher is involved
research is pointed                            research is open-ended

What are some specific ways that Venkatesh uses each of these broad ways? Explain. 


Now, let's add other types of general research.

General Types of Sociological Research
  • Longitudinal - a study that examines subjects over an extended period time.  For example, a researcher might interview kids at age 5, then at age 15 and then again at 25.  Some research is conducted over the course of decades by different researchers.
  • Cross-sectional - a study that examines a group of people at a single point in time.  For example, like taking a section of cake that has different layers, a researcher might take a sample of people from a group like SHS.  The research might examine 10 students from each grade to get an understanding of the school as a whole.  The key here is that the researcher studies a bunch of people from the same group/society. 
  • Cross-cultural - a study that compares subjects from two or more cultures.  The key here is that a cross-cultural study examines people that are part of different groups/societies and compares them.
  • Qualitative or Quantitative - qualitative is subjective and descriptive; it examines the qualities about a subject.  Quantitative is objective and involves examining numbers or statistics.
3.  Is Venkatesh's research better considered longitudinal or cross-sectional?

4.  Any questions about the general types of research?

Now let's examine the specific ways that sociologists gather their research.  For more info,  Open Stax sociology textbook explains the methods in this chapter.

Methods of sociological research
These are some of the more common methods of research that you will come across in sociology:

Qualitative:
Survey - interviews that are open-ended 
Field work/ethnography - observing subjects by living with them, watching them and taking notes 
 One example is SHS grad and Brown U. professor, Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve's research.
Historical analysis - examing changes over time in comparison to present day. 
Content Analysis - examining the content of media or other cultural productions

 Quantitative

Survey - questionnaires that are close-ended such as multiple choice or likert scale.
Experiment/Audit study - comparing the responses of two or more different reactions.
Statistical analysis - existing sources (data sets, such as GSS or Census data)


6.  Which of the methods above does Venkatesh use in the excerpt from Gang Leader? Explain when/how.  (Arguably he does 5 of them!)


Important considerations in research;  The importance of both ethics and peer-review in research:

Read this critique of Venkatesh's work and answer the question below.
7.  What are the criticisms of Venkatesh's Gang Leader research?

For more info on Venkatesh's work:
           


7 comments:

  1. Mr Salituro, I enjoyed the reading and the clip of the author so much. I think I am going to read the rest of Venkatesh's book. It has really peeked my interest. Thank you for making me aware of his work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that Venkatesh was so brave while conducting this research. Even though they teased him for his survey, he kept going back and trying different ways to try and learn these people's lifestyle. I loved the reading! I thought that it was very interesting! When I go to the city, I never really think about the surrounding areas, and end up at the touristy parts of the city, never the areas where J.T. lived and where any gang activity is apparent. This reading has sort of made me more aware of what is also going on in the city, stuff that you don't just see everyday when downtown.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree! I think the persistence that was encouraged by his relentless curiosity he showed was very admirable.

      Delete
  3. In the NPR article, Venkatesh states "I thought I was coming in there to be the expert and I ended up being humbled practically every day." I think that this notes an important merit of qualitative data over quantitative data. It shows that, by pushing one out of their comfort zone, immersion fosters the open-mindedness necessary to learn about other cultures.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Watched the video on YouTube.. It was really interesting how Sudhir managed to get into the group and get into the higher ranks of the gangsters.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Its great how Venkatesh was able to gain so much respect from a gang that many people fear of. This just shows that although these people do illegal things they are very open to talking to people and expressing what they are all about

    ReplyDelete
  6. Your post made me realized how researcher is truly a hard work! I learned that one has to be more curious and ask a lot of question that relates in order to know more. Researches has to include a lot of legitimate sources as well. I also learned how it's not easy to research and do sociology because it has to be a quality research or one person is not legit.

    ReplyDelete